Respublica v. Donagan

2 Yeates 437
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 15, 1799·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Seri per ewr.

The court before whom the trial was had, under their general authority to preserve the peace, had a right to require such bail and for such a length of time, as they judged would best answer the ends of public justice. No doubt can be entertained of it. And it would be highly improper for us to interfere, in a matter wherein they have exercised their legal discretion. Unsafe would the community be, if such characters could prowl at large through the country, without a sufficient tie on them.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respublica v. Donagan, 2 Yeates 437 (Pa. 1799).

2 Yeates 437 (Respublica v. Donagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ogilvie
Tenth Circuit, 2025
Commonwealth v. Eisenberg, M., Aplt
98 A.3d 1268 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
United States v. Mills
21 F. Supp. 616 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1937)
Commonwealth v. Foster
28 Pa. Super. 400 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)