Respublica v. Coates

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Respublica v. Coates

2 U.S. 109

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Respublica v. Coates. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Yeates 35 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 1, 1790·Published

Opinion

THIS was an action on an official bond executed by the defendant; and the real plaintiff, having neglected to strike a jury, the defendant’s ccunsel moved for a rule for trial by proviso; but on a suggestion from the Attorney General, [110]*110approved by the Court, that such a rule could not be granted against the commonwealth, the motion was made for a peremptory rule to try at the next term; under which the Court said, they would order the jury to be qualified.

Levy for the plaintiff; Serjeant for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THIS was an action on an official bond executed by the defendant; and the real plaintiff, having neglected to strike a jury, the defendant’s ccunsel moved for a rule for trial by proviso; but on a suggestion from the Attorney General, [110]*110approved by the Court, that such a rule could not be granted against the commonwealth, the motion was made for a peremptory rule to try at the next term; under which the Court said, they would order the jury to be qualified.

Levy for the plaintiff; Serjeant for the defendant.

Respublica v. Coates, 2 U.S. 109 (1790).

Pincite

2 U.S. 109 (Respublica v. Coates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.