Respublica v. Clarkson
1 Yeates 46
Opinion
See 1 Atk. 82, where Lord Hardwicke observes, “Certifi- “ cates are matters of judgment, and I do not know that a “mandamus would lie to compel an allowance; for it is dis-‘1 cretionary in the commissioners first, and afterwards in the “Lord Chancellor; and yet it ought not to be arbitrary either ¿¿a-1 “in the ^commissioners or the Chancellor to say, we J “will, or we will not, allow a certificate; but they [49]*49“ought to be governed entirely by fairness or fraudulent “behaviour in the bankrupt.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Respublica v. Clarkson, 1 Yeates 46 (Pa. 1791).
1 Yeates 46 (Respublica v. Clarkson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edelman v. Boardman, Secretary of Revenue
2 A.2d 393 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Kell v. Rudy
1 Pa. Super. 507 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1896)
Commonwealth ex rel. Snyder v. Mitchell
2 Pen. & W. 517 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1831)