Respublica v. Caldwell

1 U.S. 150, 1 Dall. 150
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 1, 1785·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

McKean, Chief Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court, that the evidence was inadmissible, for two reasons: First, Because it would only amount to matter of opinion, whereas, it is on facts the court must proceed ; and the necessary facts are already in proof. Secondly, Because it would be no justification ; for, on the same principle that the defendant might carry his wharf twelve feet, he could justify extending it farther ; or any other man might excuse a similar intrusion. Suppose, for instance, a street were 60 feet wide, 12 feet might be taken off it, without doing any material injury to the public property, or creating any great obstruction to passengers; yet surely this will not justify any man’s actually buildim» upon, and assuming the property of the twelve feet that could be tl’w spared.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Respublica v. Caldwell, 1 U.S. 150, 1 Dall. 150 (1785).

1 U.S. 150 (Respublica v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ballentine v. Webb
13 L.R.A. 321 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)
People v. Detroit White Lead Works Corp.
9 L.R.A. 722 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)
People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.
4 P. 1152 (California Supreme Court, 1884)
State v. Kaster
35 Iowa 221 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1872)
Dover v. Portsmouth Bridge
17 N.H. 200 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1845)
Tibbal v. Cahoon
10 Watts 232 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1840)