Resper v. Maryland

Fourth Circuit

Resper v. Maryland

613 F. App'x 232

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2015·No. No. 15-6357·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Resper appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motions for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Resper v. Maryland, No. 8:13-cv-03717-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 3, 2014; filed Feb. 12, 2015 and entered Feb. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal [233] contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Wayne Resper appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motions for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Resper v. Maryland, No. 8:13-cv-03717-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 3, 2014; filed Feb. 12, 2015 and entered Feb. 13, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal [233] contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Resper v. Maryland, 613 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

613 F. App'x 232 (Resper v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related