Resort Marketing Associates, Inc. v. Netter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Resort Marketing Associates, Inc. v. Netter

472 So. 2d 887, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1790, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14440

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 23, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2213

StatusPublished

This text of 472 So. 2d 887 (Resort Marketing Associates, Inc. v. Netter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Resort Marketing Associates, Inc. v. Netter, 472 So. 2d 887, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1790, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14440 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment entered by the trial court on post-trial motion for Port Largo Club, Inc. notwithstanding the verdict against it is reversed both because Port Largo entered into a binding stipulation of its liability on the contract in question, Fla.R.Jud. Admin. 2.060(g); Lotspeich Co. v. Neogard Corp., 416 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and because the evidence fully supports that jury finding. After remand, judgment shall be entered in favor of the appellant, Resort Marketing Associates, Inc. and against Port Largo in accordance with the jury verdict.

There was no error, however, in the proceedings as against the co-defendant Netter. The judgment entered on the jury verdict for him is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment entered by the trial court on post-trial motion for Port Largo Club, Inc. notwithstanding the verdict against it is reversed both because Port Largo entered into a binding stipulation of its liability on the contract in question, Fla.R.Jud. Admin. 2.060(g); Lotspeich Co. v. Neogard Corp., 416 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and because the evidence fully supports that jury finding. After remand, judgment shall be entered in favor of the appellant, Resort Marketing Associates, Inc. and against Port Largo in accordance with the jury verdict.

There was no error, however, in the proceedings as against the co-defendant Netter. The judgment entered on the jury verdict for him is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 So. 2d 887, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1790, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/resort-marketing-associates-inc-v-netter-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack