Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Republic Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Tyler Abell, and Alan Kay

23 F.3d 402, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18543, 1994 WL 200523
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 1994
Docket93-1537
StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.3d 402 (Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Republic Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Tyler Abell, and Alan Kay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Republic Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Tyler Abell, and Alan Kay, 23 F.3d 402, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18543, 1994 WL 200523 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

23 F.3d 402
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Receiver for Republic
Savings Bank, F.S.B., Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Tyler ABELL, Defendant Appellant,
and
Alan KAY, Defendant.

No. 93-1537.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 3, 1993.
Decided May 23, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-92-2024)

Tyler Abell, appellant pro se.

Elliott Bruce Adler, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Washington, DC, for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Tyler Abell appeals from the district court's order finding him liable on a note issued to the law firm of Bregman, Abell & Kay. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Abell, CA-92-2024 (D. Md. Mar. 9, 1993; Apr. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

After the Resolution Trust Corporation moved for partial summary judgment, Abell did not receive the notice required by Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir.1975). However, on this record we find the failure to be harmless error. Fed.R.Civ.P. 61

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F.3d 402, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18543, 1994 WL 200523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/resolution-trust-corporation-as-receiver-for-repub-ca4-1994.