Resolution Trust Corp. v. Shemonsky

68 F. App'x 968
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJuly 2, 2003
DocketNo. 03-1270
StatusPublished

This text of 68 F. App'x 968 (Resolution Trust Corp. v. Shemonsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Shemonsky, 68 F. App'x 968 (Fed. Cir. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Michael Shemonsky responds to this court’s order that directed the parties to show cause why his appeal of an order by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania should not be transmitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Shemonsky has not convinced us that the district court’s jurisdiction arose in part under the Little Tucker Act. It appears that Shemonsky was sued to enjoin him from interfering with the receivership involving Atlantic Financial Savings, F.A., related to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act. Thus, his appeal does not fall within our limited jurisdiction, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295, and we transfer the case to the Third Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

This appeal is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 F. App'x 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/resolution-trust-corp-v-shemonsky-cafc-2003.