Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp. And Michael D. Jones, Defendants-Counterclaim the First F.A., Defendant-Counterclaim Sherman Dantzler and Jack Shirek, and the First F.A. Of Orlando and Resolution Trust Corp., Counter-Defendants. Michael D. Jones Robert S. Guskiewicz R.S. Futch, Jr. v. Resolution Trust Corp., Defendant-Third Party v. Philip Donlevy William Crawford Robert Stone v. Seminole Flying and Soaring, Inc., and the First F.A. Of Orlando, Third Party Resolution Trust Corp., Plaintiff-Counter v. Lake Pickett, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership Michael D. Jones, as General Partner, D/B/A Lake Pickett, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership Michael D. Jones, Individually and as Trustee, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, the First F.A. Of Orlando

20 F.3d 397, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10120
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 1994
Docket91-3924
StatusPublished

This text of 20 F.3d 397 (Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp. And Michael D. Jones, Defendants-Counterclaim the First F.A., Defendant-Counterclaim Sherman Dantzler and Jack Shirek, and the First F.A. Of Orlando and Resolution Trust Corp., Counter-Defendants. Michael D. Jones Robert S. Guskiewicz R.S. Futch, Jr. v. Resolution Trust Corp., Defendant-Third Party v. Philip Donlevy William Crawford Robert Stone v. Seminole Flying and Soaring, Inc., and the First F.A. Of Orlando, Third Party Resolution Trust Corp., Plaintiff-Counter v. Lake Pickett, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership Michael D. Jones, as General Partner, D/B/A Lake Pickett, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership Michael D. Jones, Individually and as Trustee, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, the First F.A. Of Orlando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp. And Michael D. Jones, Defendants-Counterclaim the First F.A., Defendant-Counterclaim Sherman Dantzler and Jack Shirek, and the First F.A. Of Orlando and Resolution Trust Corp., Counter-Defendants. Michael D. Jones Robert S. Guskiewicz R.S. Futch, Jr. v. Resolution Trust Corp., Defendant-Third Party v. Philip Donlevy William Crawford Robert Stone v. Seminole Flying and Soaring, Inc., and the First F.A. Of Orlando, Third Party Resolution Trust Corp., Plaintiff-Counter v. Lake Pickett, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership Michael D. Jones, as General Partner, D/B/A Lake Pickett, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership Michael D. Jones, Individually and as Trustee, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, the First F.A. Of Orlando, 20 F.3d 397, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10120 (1st Cir. 1994).

Opinion

20 F.3d 397

RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Plaintiff,
v.
DUNMAR CORP. and Michael D. Jones, Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs,
The First F.A., Defendant-Counterclaim Defendant,
Sherman Dantzler and Jack Shirek, Defendants,
and
The First F.A. of Orlando and Resolution Trust Corp.,
Counter-Defendants.
Michael D. JONES; Robert S. Guskiewicz; R.S. Futch, Jr.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Philip DONLEVY; William Crawford; Robert Stone, Defendants,
v.
SEMINOLE FLYING AND SOARING, INC., and The First F.A. of
Orlando, Third Party Defendants.
RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,
v.
LAKE PICKETT, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership; Michael
D. Jones, as general partner, d/b/a Lake Pickett, Ltd., a
Florida Limited Partnership; Michael D. Jones, individually
and as Trustee, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants,
The First F.A. of Orlando, Defendant.

No. 91-3924.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

April 12, 1994.

Broad and Cassel, Brenda Lee London, Robert D. Gatton, Orlando, FL, for appellants.

Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, FL, E. Givens Goodspeed, Kirk K. Van Tine, Baker & Botts, Washington, DC, for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Nos. 89-205-Civ-Orl-19, 89-207-Civ-Orl-19, 89-208-Civ-Orl-19), Patricia C. Fawsett, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 23, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 7 F.3d 1006)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.
20 F.3d 397 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F.3d 397, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/resolution-trust-corp-v-dunmar-corp-and-michael-d-jones-ca1-1994.