Resnikoff v. Yagoda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Resnikoff v. Yagoda

119 A.D.2d 648, 501 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55574

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 119 A.D.2d 648 (Resnikoff v. Yagoda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Resnikoff v. Yagoda, 119 A.D.2d 648, 501 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55574 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged oral partnership agreement and fraud, the plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of [649]*649the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated June 6, 1984, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing his complaint, and (2) from so much of an order of the same court, dated December 5, 1984, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination.

Appeal from the order dated June 6, 1984 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order dated December 5, 1984, made upon reargument.

Order dated December 5, 1984 affirmed, insofar as appealed from, for reasons stated by Justice Bellard in his memorandum decision dated April 19, 1984.

The respondents are awarded one bill of costs. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for breach of an alleged oral partnership agreement and fraud, the plaintiff appeals (1) from an order of [649]*649the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated June 6, 1984, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing his complaint, and (2) from so much of an order of the same court, dated December 5, 1984, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination.

Appeal from the order dated June 6, 1984 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order dated December 5, 1984, made upon reargument.

Order dated December 5, 1984 affirmed, insofar as appealed from, for reasons stated by Justice Bellard in his memorandum decision dated April 19, 1984.

The respondents are awarded one bill of costs. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Thompson and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 648, 501 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/resnikoff-v-yagoda-nyappdiv-1986.