Resnick v. Gribetz

487 N.E.2d 908, 66 N.Y.2d 729, 496 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17283
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, with costs, and a new trial granted. There is no evidence in this record to support a finding of express, as opposed to implied, assumption of risk (compare, Arbegast v Board of Educ., 65 NY2d 161). The trial court erred in charging the jury, over plaintiff’s objection, that a finding of assumption of risk would bar recovery.

[731] Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Resnick v. Gribetz, 487 N.E.2d 908, 66 N.Y.2d 729, 496 N.Y.S.2d 998, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17283 (N.Y. 1985).

487 N.E.2d 908 (Resnick v. Gribetz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related