Resnick v. Alexander Muss & Sons, Inc.
414 So. 2d 33, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28973
Opinion
The directed verdict entered in favor of the defendants at the close of the plaintiffs’ case is reversed. Whether the landlord maintained the common areas in a reasonably safe condition is a question for the jury’s resolution. Firth v. Marhoefer, 406 So.2d 521 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Bennett v. Mattison, 382 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Resnick v. Alexander Muss & Sons, Inc., 414 So. 2d 33, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28973 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
414 So. 2d 33 (Resnick v. Alexander Muss & Sons, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Firth v. Marhoefer
406 So. 2d 521 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Bennett v. Mattison
382 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)