Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Resmondo v. Resmondo

Resmondo v. Resmondo

18 So. 3d 41, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13234, 2009 WL 2871143
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 9, 2009
Docket2D09-1878
StatusPublished

This text of 18 So. 3d 41 (Resmondo v. Resmondo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Resmondo v. Resmondo, 18 So. 3d 41, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13234, 2009 WL 2871143 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ghay v. Ghay, 954 So.2d 1186, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“If further discovery reveals that a temporary support order is inequitable or based upon improper calculations, any inequity can usually be resolved in the final judgment, after a full and fair opportunity to be heard.”).

CASANUEVA, C.J., and ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ghay v. Ghay
954 So. 2d 1186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 So. 3d 41, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13234, 2009 WL 2871143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/resmondo-v-resmondo-fladistctapp-2009.