Resmondo v. Resmondo

18 So. 3d 41, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13234, 2009 WL 2871143
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 2009·No. 2D09-1878·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ghay v. Ghay, 954 So.2d 1186, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“If further discovery reveals that a temporary support order is inequitable or based upon improper calculations, any inequity can usually be resolved in the final judgment, after a full and fair opportunity to be heard.”).

CASANUEVA, C.J., and ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Resmondo v. Resmondo, 18 So. 3d 41, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 13234, 2009 WL 2871143 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

18 So. 3d 41 (Resmondo v. Resmondo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ghay v. Ghay
954 So. 2d 1186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)