Resig v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Resig v. State

81 S.W.3d 724, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 2002 WL 1791175

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 6, 2002

DocketNo. ED 81346

StatusPublished

This text of 81 S.W.3d 724 (Resig v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Resig v. State, 81 S.W.3d 724, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1647, 2002 WL 1791175 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Chief Judge.

Richard A. Resig filed a notice of appeal in which he stated he is appealing a “habe-as corpus request based upon a revocation of probation which failed to specify the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking probation.” He attached to his notice of appeal a copy of the judgment entered by the circuit court on May 13, 2002. In [725]*725the judgment, the circuit court denied appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus.

There is no appeal from a decision in a habeas corpus proceeding. Bebee v. State, 619 S.W.2d 363 (Mo.App. S.D.1981). This Court issued an order directing appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of an appealable judgment. Appellant has failed to file a response.

The appeal is dismissed for lack of an appealable judgment.

LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI