Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Resetarits Construction Corp. v. Olmsted

Resetarits Construction Corp. v. Olmsted

118 A.D.3d 1454, 987 N.Y.S.2d 586
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 20, 2014
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 118 A.D.3d 1454 (Resetarits Construction Corp. v. Olmsted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Resetarits Construction Corp. v. Olmsted, 118 A.D.3d 1454, 987 N.Y.S.2d 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered May 15, 2013. The order, among other things, granted that part of plaintiffs motion seeking summary judgment against defendant Elizabeth Pierce Olmstead, M.D. Center for the Visually Impaired.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Present — Scudder, PJ., Fahey, Carni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 A.D.3d 1454, 987 N.Y.S.2d 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/resetarits-construction-corp-v-olmsted-nyappdiv-2014.