Reserve Realty, LLC v. Windemere Reserve, LLC

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Reserve Realty, LLC v. Windemere Reserve, LLC

170 A.3d 679, 327 Conn. 910

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 4, 2017·Published

Opinion

The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 174 Conn.App. 130, 165 A.3d 162, is granted, limited to the following question:

"In concluding that the purchase and sale agreements forming the basis of the plaintiffs' claim for real estate brokerage fees constituted a tying arrangement in violation of the Connecticut Antitrust Act, General Statutes § 35-24 et seq., did the Appellate Court properly rely on State v. Hossan-Maxwell, Inc., 181 Conn. 655, 436 A.2d 284 (1980) ?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 174 Conn.App. 130, 165 A.3d 162, is granted, limited to the following question:

"In concluding that the purchase and sale agreements forming the basis of the plaintiffs' claim for real estate brokerage fees constituted a tying arrangement in violation of the Connecticut Antitrust Act, General Statutes § 35-24 et seq., did the Appellate Court properly rely on State v. Hossan-Maxwell, Inc., 181 Conn. 655, 436 A.2d 284 (1980) ?"

Reserve Realty, LLC v. Windemere Reserve, LLC, 170 A.3d 679, 327 Conn. 910 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

170 A.3d 679 (Reserve Realty, LLC v. Windemere Reserve, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related