RESERVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF DALLAS, TEXAS v. Bearden
This text of 102 S.E.2d 494 (RESERVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF DALLAS, TEXAS v. Bearden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of the certiorari which this court granted to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals (Reserve Life Co. v. Bearden, 96 Ga. App. 549, 101 S. E. 2d 120), we are of the opinion that the ruling by the court, as set out in the first headnote and the corresponding division of the opinion and upon which error is assigned, is supported by and in harmony with the prior decisions of this court, viz., Mechanics & Traders Ins. Co. v. Mutual Real Estate &c. Assn., 98 Ga. 262 (25 S. E. 457); German-American Mutual Life Assn. v. Farley, 102 Ga. 720 (1) (29 S. E. 615); Johnson v. Aetna Ins. Co., 123 Ga. 404 (51 S. E. 339, 107 Am. St. R. 92); Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Hale, 177 Ga. 632 (170 S. E. 875); John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Yates, 182 Ga. 213 (185 S. E. 268). Accordingly, its judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 S.E.2d 494, 213 Ga. 904, 1958 Ga. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reserve-life-insurance-company-of-dallas-texas-v-bearden-ga-1958.