Reservation Services Group, LLC v. State of Georgia Ex Rel. John D. Sours, Administrator of the Fair Business Practices Act
This text of Reservation Services Group, LLC v. State of Georgia Ex Rel. John D. Sours, Administrator of the Fair Business Practices Act (Reservation Services Group, LLC v. State of Georgia Ex Rel. John D. Sours, Administrator of the Fair Business Practices Act) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
September 15, 2014 ATLANTA,__________________
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A14A1976. RESERVATION SERVICES GROUP, LLC v. STATE OF GEORGIA.
The State of Georgia, acting through the Governor’s Office of Consumer Protection, served an investigative demand on Reservation Services Group, LLC (“RSG”), a Florida company, pursuant to OCGA § 10-1-403 (a). RSG refused to comply with the demand. The State then filed a petition in superior court to compel compliance with the investigative demand pursuant to OCGA § 10-1-404 (b). The superior court granted the petition, and RSG appealed directly to this Court. The State has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that RSG could obtain appellate review only by filing an application for discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). That Code section requires a discretionary application in “[a]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of . . . state and local administrative agencies.” In Tri-State Building & Supply v. Reid, 251 Ga. 38 (302 SE2d 566) (1983), the Supreme Court held that an investigative demand is a “decision” of a state agency, and that a superior court’s review of that decision must, therefore, be appealed by discretionary application. RSG argues that Tri-State does not apply because there, the defendant filed an action in superior court to quash the investigative demand, whereas here, the State filed an action to compel compliance with the demand. This is a distinction without a difference; in both cases, the superior court reviewed a decision of a state agency. Based on the Supreme Court’s controlling decision in Tri-State, the State’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction due to RSG’s failure to comply with the discretionary appeal procedure. Our previous order granting oral argument in this case is vacated.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 09/15/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reservation Services Group, LLC v. State of Georgia Ex Rel. John D. Sours, Administrator of the Fair Business Practices Act, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reservation-services-group-llc-v-state-of-georgia--gactapp-2014.