Resendez-Godina v. Gonzales
This text of 127 F. App'x 362 (Resendez-Godina v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[363]*363MEMORANDUM
Armando Resendezr-Godina, a native and Citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence. Hasan v. Ashcroft, 380 F.3d 1114, 1119 (9th Cir.2004). We conclude that the IJ properly denied the CAT claim. See id. at 1123-24.
The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 F. App'x 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/resendez-godina-v-gonzales-ca9-2005.