Resch 304507 v. Rink
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
BRANDON MARCUS RESCH,
Plaintiff, File no: 2:21-cv-227 v. HON. ROBERT J. JONKER DAVID RINK,
Defendant. /
ORDER APPROVING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on October 26, 2023 (ECF No. 55). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 55) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Rink’s motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (ECF No. 53) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that costs in the amount of $305.65 for the costs incurred to take Plaintiff’s deposition are assessed against Plaintiff Resch, payable to Defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is TERMINATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is denied a certificate of appealability. The Court discerns no good-faith basis for appeal of this matter. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Resch 304507 v. Rink (Resch 304507 v. Rink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.