RES Exhibit Services, LLC v. LNW Gaming, Inc. f/k/a SG Gaming, Inc. and f/k/a Bally Gaming, Inc.
This text of RES Exhibit Services, LLC v. LNW Gaming, Inc. f/k/a SG Gaming, Inc. and f/k/a Bally Gaming, Inc. (RES Exhibit Services, LLC v. LNW Gaming, Inc. f/k/a SG Gaming, Inc. and f/k/a Bally Gaming, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 ISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 * * *
4 RES EXHIBIT SERVICES, LLC, a New Case No. 2:21-cv-01953-APG-EJY York limited liability company, 5 Plaintiff, 6 ORDER v. 7 LNW GAMING, INC. f/k/a SG GAMING, 8 INC. f/k/a BALLY GAMING, INC., a Nevada corporation, 9 Defendant. 10 LNW GAMING, INC. f/k/a SG GAMING, 11 INC. f/k/a BALLY GAMING, INC., a Nevada corporation, 12 Counterclaimant, 13 v. 14 RES EXHIBIT SERVICES, LLC; a New 15 York limited liability company; JAMES LEONARDO, an individual; JERI 16 WIEDEMER, an individual; and ROBERT REYES, an individual, 17 Counterdefendants. 18 19 Pending before the Court is LNW Gaming, Inc.’s Motion to Seal Documents. ECF No. 176. 20 There is a strong presumption of public access to judicial records. Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of 21 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). However, public access is not absolute. Id. The 22 party seeking to seal a judicial record bears the burden of overcoming the strong presumption of 23 public access. Id. at 1178. To overcome this burden, “parties seeking to maintain the confidentiality 24 of documents attached to non-dispositive motions must make a particularized showing of ‘good 25 cause’ to overcome the presumption of public access.” Aevoe Corp. v. AE Tech. Co., Case No. 2:12- 26 cv-00053-GMN, 2013 WL 2302310, at *1 (D. Nev. May 24, 2013) (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d 27 at 1180); see also Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1097 (9th Cir. 1 unrelated to the merits of the case” need only satisfy the good cause standard). The Court has 2 reviewed the documents LNW Gaming seeks to seal and finds each meets the good cause standard 3 for sealing. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Seal Documents (ECF No. 176) 5 is GRANTED. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Exhibits 2, 4, 7-10, 12-14, and 17-21 to ECF No. 175 are 7 and shall remain sealed. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the unredacted version of the Opposition to the Motion to 9 Compel at ECF No. 175 shall remain sealed. 10 DATED this 5th day of May, 2025.
12 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH 13 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
RES Exhibit Services, LLC v. LNW Gaming, Inc. f/k/a SG Gaming, Inc. and f/k/a Bally Gaming, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/res-exhibit-services-llc-v-lnw-gaming-inc-fka-sg-gaming-inc-and-nvd-2025.