Requeno v. Integon General Insurance

421 S.E.2d 784, 332 N.C. 339, 1992 N.C. LEXIS 469
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 4, 1992·No. No. 603PA90·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the superior court for the reasons stated in Lanning v. Allstate Insurance Co., 332 N.C. 309, 420 S.E.2d 180 (1992), filed today.

Affirmed.

Justices FRYE and LAKE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Requeno v. Integon General Insurance, 421 S.E.2d 784, 332 N.C. 339, 1992 N.C. LEXIS 469 (N.C. 1992).

421 S.E.2d 784 (Requeno v. Integon General Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
434 S.E.2d 625 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1993)