Republican National Committee v. Aguilar

Opinion

1 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Republican National Committee, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-00518-CDS-MDC 5 Plaintiffs Order Moving up Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion for Leave 6 v. to Supplement Authority 7|| Francisco Aguilar, et al., [ECF No. 118] 8 Defendants 9 10 On September 30, 2024, defendant Francisco Aguilar, in his official capacity as Nevada 1]|| Secretary of State, filed a motion for leave, pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(g), to supplement his authorities in support of his motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. ECF No. 118. 13|| Aguilar’s proposed supplemental authority is the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Arizona Alliance for 14|| Retired Americans v. Mayes, 2024 WL 4246721 (9th Cir. Sep. 20, 2024). Plaintiffs’ deadline to 15] respond to the motion for leave is currently October 14, 2024. As I was already aware of this new Ninth Circuit decision prior to Aguilar’s motion to supplement, any response by plaintiffs need 17|| not be extensive. Therefore, the deadline for plaintiffs’ response (or notice of non-opposition) to 18]| defendant’s motion for leave is advanced from October 14, 2024, to October 7, 2024. No reply brief will be necessary, so Aguilar should not file one. 20 Dated: October 2, 2024 /, / SZ Cristinad. Silva Uni edStates District Judge 23 i) 24 25 26