Republican National Committee v. Aguilar

D. Nevada

Republican National Committee v. Aguilar

DecidedOctober 2, 2024

Docket2:24-cv-00518

StatusUnknown

This text of Republican National Committee v. Aguilar (Republican National Committee v. Aguilar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Republican National Committee v. Aguilar, (D. Nev. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Republican National Committee, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-00518-CDS-MDC 5 Plaintiffs Order Moving up Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion for Leave 6 v. to Supplement Authority 7|| Francisco Aguilar, et al., [ECF No. 118] 8 Defendants 9 10 On September 30, 2024, defendant Francisco Aguilar, in his official capacity as Nevada 1]|| Secretary of State, filed a motion for leave, pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(g), to supplement his authorities in support of his motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. ECF No. 118. 13|| Aguilar’s proposed supplemental authority is the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Arizona Alliance for 14|| Retired Americans v. Mayes, 2024 WL 4246721 (9th Cir. Sep. 20, 2024). Plaintiffs’ deadline to 15] respond to the motion for leave is currently October 14, 2024. As I was already aware of this new Ninth Circuit decision prior to Aguilar’s motion to supplement, any response by plaintiffs need 17|| not be extensive. Therefore, the deadline for plaintiffs’ response (or notice of non-opposition) to 18]| defendant’s motion for leave is advanced from October 14, 2024, to October 7, 2024. No reply brief will be necessary, so Aguilar should not file one. 20 Dated: October 2, 2024 /, / SZ Cristinad. Silva Uni edStates District Judge 23 i) 24 25 26

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Republican National Committee, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-00518-CDS-MDC 5 Plaintiffs Order Moving up Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion for Leave 6 v. to Supplement Authority 7|| Francisco Aguilar, et al., [ECF No. 118] 8 Defendants 9 10 On September 30, 2024, defendant Francisco Aguilar, in his official capacity as Nevada 1]|| Secretary of State, filed a motion for leave, pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(g), to supplement his authorities in support of his motion to dismiss the first amended complaint. ECF No. 118. 13|| Aguilar’s proposed supplemental authority is the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Arizona Alliance for 14|| Retired Americans v. Mayes, 2024 WL 4246721 (9th Cir. Sep. 20, 2024). Plaintiffs’ deadline to 15] respond to the motion for leave is currently October 14, 2024. As I was already aware of this new Ninth Circuit decision prior to Aguilar’s motion to supplement, any response by plaintiffs need 17|| not be extensive. Therefore, the deadline for plaintiffs’ response (or notice of non-opposition) to 18]| defendant’s motion for leave is advanced from October 14, 2024, to October 7, 2024. No reply brief will be necessary, so Aguilar should not file one. 20 Dated: October 2, 2024 /, / SZ Cristinad. Silva Uni edStates District Judge 23 i) 24 25 26

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Republican National Committee v. Aguilar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/republican-national-committee-v-aguilar-nvd-2024.