Republic Supply Co. v. Powell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Republic Supply Co. v. Powell

1918 OK 567, 175 P. 519, 71 Okla. 105, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 878

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 8, 1918

Docket9160

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1918 OK 567 (Republic Supply Co. v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Republic Supply Co. v. Powell, 1918 OK 567, 175 P. 519, 71 Okla. 105, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 878 (Okla. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

HARDY, J.

From a decree adjudging that certain laborers, who were plaintiffs below, held liens superior to that asserted by it against the property of the Healdton-Wheeler Oil & Gas Company, the Republic Supply Company appeals.

Tbe material furnished by plaintiff in error was delivered during the months of August and September, 1914, and statement claiming a lien therefor, as required b,y section 3865, Rev. Laws 1910, was filed December 14, 1914. The claims of plaintiffs were filed February 10, 1915. A receiver having been appointed, by agreement the property of the Healdton-Wheeler Oil & Gas Company, consisting of certain material furnished by plaintiff in error, was sold, and this contest involves claims for priority against said fund. While there is no evidence in the record showing when said work was performed by plaintiffs, it is asserted by plaintiff in error, and not denied, that same was performed in December, 1914, and January, 1915, after the materials were furnished for which plaintiff in error asserts a prior lien. If we assume that all the plaintiffs complied with the law with reference to filing statement and claim for liens, the judgment must he reversed. The proceeds were insufficient to pay all the claimants in full and by virtue of section 3879, Rev. Laws 1910, the court should have ordered them to be paid in proportion to the amount due each.

The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views herein expressed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDY, J.

From a decree adjudging that certain laborers, who were plaintiffs below, held liens superior to that asserted by it against the property of the Healdton-Wheeler Oil & Gas Company, the Republic Supply Company appeals.

Tbe material furnished by plaintiff in error was delivered during the months of August and September, 1914, and statement claiming a lien therefor, as required b,y section 3865, Rev. Laws 1910, was filed December 14, 1914. The claims of plaintiffs were filed February 10, 1915. A receiver having been appointed, by agreement the property of the Healdton-Wheeler Oil & Gas Company, consisting of certain material furnished by plaintiff in error, was sold, and this contest involves claims for priority against said fund. While there is no evidence in the record showing when said work was performed by plaintiffs, it is asserted by plaintiff in error, and not denied, that same was performed in December, 1914, and January, 1915, after the materials were furnished for which plaintiff in error asserts a prior lien. If we assume that all the plaintiffs complied with the law with reference to filing statement and claim for liens, the judgment must he reversed. The proceeds were insufficient to pay all the claimants in full and by virtue of section 3879, Rev. Laws 1910, the court should have ordered them to be paid in proportion to the amount due each.

The judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views herein expressed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1918 OK 567, 175 P. 519, 71 Okla. 105, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/republic-supply-co-v-powell-okla-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack