Republic Steel Corp. v. United States

6 Ct. Int'l Trade 240
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Republic Steel Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 591 F. Supp. 640
United States Court of International Trade·Decided November 10, 1983·No. Consolidated Court No. 82-03-00372·Published

Opinion

Watson, Judge:

Consolidation, which once held promise for the efficient and speedy resolution of this action, now presents a problem. U.S. Steel has taken an interlocutory appeal of this Court’s decision denying its corporate counsel access to business confidential information in the administrative record here under judicial review. The remaining five plaintiffs had moved to sever their actions at a time when the taking of an appeal was uncertain and the Court left the motion pending to await future events. Since the appeal is now a reality, the Court considers it necessary, for the reasons set out more fully in United States Steel Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, et al. v. United States, et al. (Slip Opinion 83-115, November 9, 1983) to sever U.S. Steel’s action from the others so that the other plaintiffs may proceed in accordance with the statutory priority and expedited treatment required for their action. It would be unfair for them to have to await the outcome of an issue which is of importance only to plaintiff U.S. Steel.

The Court has reviewed the filings of the parties on the question of severance and found no good reason to maintain this action in its consolidated form.

Accordingly, it is

Oedered that the claims of U.S. Steel are severed from this action and restored to their original form as Court No. 82-07-01053.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Republic Steel Corp. v. United States, 6 Ct. Int'l Trade 240 (cit 1983).

6 Ct. Int'l Trade 240 (Republic Steel Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.