Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos

946 F.2d 18
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 4, 1991
Docket91-7310
StatusPublished

This text of 946 F.2d 18 (Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos, 946 F.2d 18 (2d Cir. 1991).

Opinion

946 F.2d 18

The REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ferdinand E. MARCOS, Imelda Marcos, Gliceria Tantoco, Vilma
Bautista, Antonio Floirendo, Paul A. Crotty, as Commissioner
of Finance of the City of New York, Department of Finance of
the City of New York, City Register's Office of the City of
New York, John Kinsella, County Clerk, Suffolk County,
Realmad Properties, Ltd., Briwater Associates, a
Partnership, and Ancor Holdings, N.V., Defendants,
Ralph Bernstein, Joseph Bernstein, Glockhurst Corporation,
N.V., New York Land Company, a/k/a Greatneckers Realty,
Inc., Canadian Land Company of America, a/k/a Canadian Land
Company of America, N.V. (formerly Lastura Corporation,
N.V.), Herald Center Ltd. (formerly Voloby Ltd.), and Nyland
(CF8) Ltd. (formerly Ainsville, N.V.), Defendants,
Security Pacific National Bank, and Security Pacific
Mortgage and Real Estate Services, Inc.,
Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellants.

No. 45, Docket 91-7310.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Aug. 26, 1991.
Decided Oct. 4, 1991.

Edward N. Meyer, New York City (Joseph A. DiBenedetto, Robert Washuta, Jonathan H. Freiberger, Winston & Strawn, of counsel), for intervenors-plaintiffs-appellants.

Jeffrey J. Greenbaum, New York City (James M. Hirschhorn, Brian K. Valentine, Sills Cummis Zuckerman Radin Tischman Epstein & Gross, P.A., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before OAKES, Chief Judge, and FEINBERG and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Security Pacific National Bank and Security Pacific Mortgage and Real Estate Services, Inc. appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Pierre N. Leval, Judge, denying their motion to intervene. For the reasons set forth in Judge Leval's opinion, 138 F.R.D. 366 (S.D.N.Y.1991), we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Republic of Philippines v. Marcos
946 F.2d 18 (Second Circuit, 1991)
Republic of the Philippines v. Marcos
138 F.R.D. 366 (S.D. New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
946 F.2d 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/republic-of-the-philippines-v-marcos-ca2-1991.