Republic of Texas v. Mumford

1 Dallam 374
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1840
DocketXV
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Dallam 374 (Republic of Texas v. Mumford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Republic of Texas v. Mumford, 1 Dallam 374 (Tex. 1840).

Opinion

JONES, JustiCE.

This case came up from the District Court of Robertson County on the two following points, reserved by Justice Mills under the forty-third section of the act organizing the district courts, for the decision of the Supreme Court.

First. Whether a marriage by bond was such a marriage as would support an indictment for bigamy.

Second. That White, the original husband, could not be introduced to prove the loss of the original marriage bond.

As it is unnecessary here to decide whether a marriage by bond, as authorized by the laws of the general council, is valid or not, it will be sufficient ground for the court in disposing of this case to determine that the admission of the testimony of the husband to prove the loss of the marriage bond was erroneous, it being evidence against her who was prosecuted and claimed as his wife. There being no record, or other proof of the marriage produced before the jury in the district court, the judgment below is reversed and the prisoner ordered to be discharged.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
803 S.W.2d 272 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Dallam 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/republic-of-texas-v-mumford-tex-1840.