Republic of Panama v. American Tobacco Co.

307 F.3d 317, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 19732, 2002 WL 31084439
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Republic of Panama v. American Tobacco Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 217 F.3d 343
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 18, 2002·No. No. 00-30687·Published

Opinion

[318]*318ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On April 1, 2002 the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in this matter, and simultaneously filed an opinion reversing the judgment of this court and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with its opinion. See Sao Paulo, State of the Federative Republic of Brazil v. American Tobacco Co., 535 U.S. 229, 122 S.Ct. 1290, 152 L.Ed.2d 346 (2002). In accordance with that opinion, in which the Supreme Court concluded that a reasonable person apprised of the facts would not believe that the district judge had any interest or bias, id. at-, 122 S.Ct. at 1292, the district court’s order denying recusal is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Republic of Panama v. American Tobacco Co., 307 F.3d 317, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 19732, 2002 WL 31084439 (5th Cir. 2002).

307 F.3d 317 (Republic of Panama v. American Tobacco Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related