Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Markiowicz

129 N.E. 710, 75 Ind. App. 57, 1921 Ind. App. LEXIS 243
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 4, 1921
DocketNo. 10,915
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 129 N.E. 710 (Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Markiowicz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Markiowicz, 129 N.E. 710, 75 Ind. App. 57, 1921 Ind. App. LEXIS 243 (Ind. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Nichols, J.

Appellees are dependents of Mike Markiowicz, deceased. The Industrial Board found that the deceased was in the employment of appellant on February 18, 1918, at a weekly wage of $24, and that on said date he received personal injury by accident arising out of and in due course of his employment, as a result of which he died December 28, 1918. There was an award accordingly for appellees. Appellant contends that the evidence does not support the finding and award, while appellees contend that the evidence is sufficient. The deceased was injured by an explosion which enveloped him with steam and gas, and struck him with debris, injuring his head, his hip and side. He was confined to his bed for a month, and received compensation for total disability for fifty-seven days. He was apparently a healthy man up to the time of his injury, but appellees’ physician testified that there was evidence of chronic disease, and the examination, his cough, and the history showed tuberculosis of the lungs. He was never well after the accident. The physician testified that the history would indicate that his trouble was the result of his injury. There was ample evidence that the injury resulted in a weakened vitality and resistance, and that latent tuberculosis was aggravated and accelerated into active tuberculosis from which he died. Without going further into the evidence, we hold [59]*59that it was sufficient to sustain the finding and award. In re Bowers (1917), 65 Ind. App. 128, 116 N. E. 842; Sallie Robinson v. National Life, etc., Ins. Co. (1921), (Ind. App.) 129 N. E. 707. The award is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Magazine v. Shull
60 N.E.2d 611 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1945)
Young v. Herrington
99 P.2d 441 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1940)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Maddox
183 S.E. 570 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Turner v. State Industrial Commission
1935 OK 963 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.
41 P.2d 605 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1934)
State v. Gageby
184 N.E. 190 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1933)
Sutton v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.
130 So. 859 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Majestic Co. v. Kreig
87 Ind. App. 694 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1928)
Calumet Foundry & Machine Co. v. Mroz
141 N.E. 883 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1923)
Pinyon Queen Mining Co. v. Industrial Commisson
204 P. 323 (Utah Supreme Court, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 N.E. 710, 75 Ind. App. 57, 1921 Ind. App. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/republic-iron-steel-co-v-markiowicz-indctapp-1921.