Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Borgen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Borgen

245 N.W. 615, 187 Minn. 373, 1932 Minn. LEXIS 1030

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 25, 1932

DocketNo. 29,075.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 245 N.W. 615 (Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Borgen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Borgen, 245 N.W. 615, 187 Minn. 373, 1932 Minn. LEXIS 1030 (Mich. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Stone, J.

Taxpayers’ action to enjoin defendant county auditor from spreading the 1931 tax levy of independent school district No. 35, St. Louis county, in excess of the $60 per capita limitation fixed by L. 1921, p. 646, c. 417. The decision was for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.

Objections to the introduction of any evidence by plaintiffs were sustained below upon grounds which need not now be examined. Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction was denied. When the case came on for trial the involved taxes had been spread and were in process of collection. That does not appear from the record, but it could not be otherwise if we indulge in the presumption, which in the absence of evidence is controlling, that the officials of St. Louis county were performing the duties imposed upon them by express statute. G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 2071, et seq. Doubtless some of the taxes have been paid, but that does not matter. The determinative thing is that decision for plaintiffs is out of question because it would involve impossible unscrambling of accomplished facts so complicated that there is no judicial machinery for their undoing.

“If, pending an appeal, an event occurs which renders it impossible to grant any relief, or which makes a decision unnecessary, the appeal will be dismissed.” Troy v. City of St. Paul, 155 Minn. 391, 395, 193 N. W. 726, 728; State ex rel. Klemer v. City Recorder, 129 Minn. 535, 152 N. W. 654; Sweeney v. Village of Ellsworth, 135 Minn. 474, 159 N. W. 1067; Moore v. McDonald, 165 Minn. 484, 205 N. W. 894.

Incidentally, it may be noted that we have held that in such cases the complaining taxpayers have an adequate remedy at law in the *375 proceedings for the collection of taxes. Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106, 188 N. W. 159; Braddock I. Min. Co. v. Erskine, 155 Minn. 70, 192 N. W. 193.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stone, J.

Taxpayers’ action to enjoin defendant county auditor from spreading the 1931 tax levy of independent school district No. 35, St. Louis county, in excess of the $60 per capita limitation fixed by L. 1921, p. 646, c. 417. The decision was for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.

Objections to the introduction of any evidence by plaintiffs were sustained below upon grounds which need not now be examined. Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction was denied. When the case came on for trial the involved taxes had been spread and were in process of collection. That does not appear from the record, but it could not be otherwise if we indulge in the presumption, which in the absence of evidence is controlling, that the officials of St. Louis county were performing the duties imposed upon them by express statute. G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 2071, et seq. Doubtless some of the taxes have been paid, but that does not matter. The determinative thing is that decision for plaintiffs is out of question because it would involve impossible unscrambling of accomplished facts so complicated that there is no judicial machinery for their undoing.

“If, pending an appeal, an event occurs which renders it impossible to grant any relief, or which makes a decision unnecessary, the appeal will be dismissed.” Troy v. City of St. Paul, 155 Minn. 391, 395, 193 N. W. 726, 728; State ex rel. Klemer v. City Recorder, 129 Minn. 535, 152 N. W. 654; Sweeney v. Village of Ellsworth, 135 Minn. 474, 159 N. W. 1067; Moore v. McDonald, 165 Minn. 484, 205 N. W. 894.

Incidentally, it may be noted that we have held that in such cases the complaining taxpayers have an adequate remedy at law in the *375 proceedings for the collection of taxes. Wall v. Borgen, 152 Minn. 106, 188 N. W. 159; Braddock I. Min. Co. v. Erskine, 155 Minn. 70, 192 N. W. 193.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 N.W. 615, 187 Minn. 373, 1932 Minn. LEXIS 1030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/republic-iron-steel-co-v-borgen-minn-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack