Republic Ins. v. N. American Philips Corp., No. 376040 (Jul. 24, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Republic Ins. v. N. American Philips Corp., No. 376040 (Jul. 24, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 5925

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJuly 24, 1991

DocketNo. 376040

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 5925 (Republic Ins. v. N. American Philips Corp., No. 376040 (Jul. 24, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Republic Ins. v. N. American Philips Corp., No. 376040 (Jul. 24, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 5925 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY AND DISCLOSURE OF PROPERTY AND ASSETS (4/10/91) Defendants have moved for prejudgment remedy and an attachment of plaintiffs' property. A hearing was held with respect to such motions on July 17, 1991 with all parties represented.

After hearing and upon a consideration of the facts, it is found that defendants have shown probable cause to sustain the validity of their claim, and the prejudgment remedy requested should be granted.

Accordingly, the motion is granted, and defendants may CT Page 5926 attach to the value of $3,379,900.00 the property of plaintiffs.

Defendants have moved for a disclosure of property and assets of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have indicated the ability to post a bond in lieu of attachment. If this is done, a disclosure would be unnecessary. Therefore, no action will be taken on the motion for disclosure at this time.

Purtill, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY AND DISCLOSURE OF PROPERTY AND ASSETS (4/10/91) Defendants have moved for prejudgment remedy and an attachment of plaintiffs' property. A hearing was held with respect to such motions on July 17, 1991 with all parties represented.

After hearing and upon a consideration of the facts, it is found that defendants have shown probable cause to sustain the validity of their claim, and the prejudgment remedy requested should be granted.

Accordingly, the motion is granted, and defendants may CT Page 5926 attach to the value of $3,379,900.00 the property of plaintiffs.

Defendants have moved for a disclosure of property and assets of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have indicated the ability to post a bond in lieu of attachment. If this is done, a disclosure would be unnecessary. Therefore, no action will be taken on the motion for disclosure at this time.

Purtill, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 5925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/republic-ins-v-n-american-philips-corp-no-376040-jul-24-1991-connsuperct-1991.