Representative Bus Co. v. Simmons

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 311
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Representative Bus Co. v. Simmons. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ohio App. 367
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 1928·Published

Opinion

SULLIVAN, PJ.

1. It is duty of bus driver, on hearing signal by one desiring to pass, to give way, without any peril to himself and passengers, to the vehicle in the rear, where the roadway is sufficient to allow passage in safety.

2. In action by automobile occupant for injuries from collision with bus refusing to permit automobile to pass on proper signal, evidence held to warrant submission to jury question of excessive speed of bus and of careless driving by bus driver.

3. Motion for new trial, which was not filed within three days, was properly stricken from the record, and allegation that counsel was misled by official publication does not show that failure to file was due to unavoidable cause.

4. Award of $10,000 for injuries to woman whose face was seriously cut and scarred, portion of nose cut away, and who suffered concussion of brain and injuries to shoulder, back, chest, and legs, preventing her from pursuing her vocation as dancing teacher, held not excessive.

(Vickery & Levine, JJ., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Representative Bus Co. v. Simmons, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 311 (Ohio Ct. App. 1928).

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 311 (Representative Bus Co. v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.