Reposa v. Pearce

54 P.2d 476, 11 Cal. App. 2d 520, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 386
California Court of Appeal·Decided January 30, 1936·No. Civ. No. 9934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

NOUESE, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order amending a bill of exceptions in Reposa v. Pearce, No. 9829 (ante, p. 517 [54 Pac. (2d) 475]). The amendment was made to include the original statements of indebtedness included in the plaintiff’s claim for special damages. Because of the judgment in the main case holding that plaintiff was not entitled to any damages, the question raised here has become moot.

For these reasons the appeal is dismissed.

Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reposa v. Pearce, 54 P.2d 476, 11 Cal. App. 2d 520, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 386 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936).

54 P.2d 476 (Reposa v. Pearce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reposa v. Pearce
54 P.2d 476 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)