R.E.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.E.P. v. State

728 So. 2d 341, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2678, 1999 WL 129474

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1999·No. No. 98-2568·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order imposing restitution. An order of restitution must be “causally connected to the offense and bear[ ] a significant relationship to the offense.” See Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913, 915 (Fla.1997). Based on the present record, appellant may be held accountable, jointly and severally with his co-defendants, in restitution for the loss of five unrecovered stolen guns. He also may be held accountable jointly and severally for the amount of the reward, as he waived that issue below.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further consistent proceedings.

JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order imposing restitution. An order of restitution must be “causally connected to the offense and bear[ ] a significant relationship to the offense.” See Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913, 915 (Fla.1997). Based on the present record, appellant may be held accountable, jointly and severally with his co-defendants, in restitution for the loss of five unrecovered stolen guns. He also may be held accountable jointly and severally for the amount of the reward, as he waived that issue below.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further consistent proceedings.

JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

R.E.P. v. State, 728 So. 2d 341, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2678, 1999 WL 129474 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

728 So. 2d 341 (R.E.P. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related