Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/R.E.P. v. State

R.E.P. v. State

728 So. 2d 341, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2678, 1999 WL 129474
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 1999
DocketNo. 98-2568
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 728 So. 2d 341 (R.E.P. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.E.P. v. State, 728 So. 2d 341, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2678, 1999 WL 129474 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals an order imposing restitution. An order of restitution must be “causally connected to the offense and bear[ ] a significant relationship to the offense.” See Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913, 915 (Fla.1997). Based on the present record, appellant may be held accountable, jointly and severally with his co-defendants, in restitution for the loss of five unrecovered stolen guns. He also may be held accountable jointly and severally for the amount of the reward, as he waived that issue below.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further consistent proceedings.

JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
728 So. 2d 341 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
728 So. 2d 341, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2678, 1999 WL 129474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rep-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.