R.E.P. v. Department of Children & Family Services
961 So. 2d 989, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10017, 2007 WL 1827241
Opinion
Based on the facts of this case, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying R.E.P.’s motion for continuance. See L.M. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 946 So.2d 42 (Fla. 4th [990]*990DCA 2006). Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s order adjudicating J.S. dependent as to R.E.P.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
R.E.P. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 961 So. 2d 989, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 10017, 2007 WL 1827241 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
961 So. 2d 989 (R.E.P. v. Department of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LM v. Department of Children and Families
946 So. 2d 42 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)