R.E.P. and D.M.S. v. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and Wilton Simpson
This text of R.E.P. and D.M.S. v. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and Wilton Simpson (R.E.P. and D.M.S. v. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and Wilton Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2024-0059 _____________________________
R.E.P. and D.M.S.,
Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES and WILTON SIMPSON,
Appellees. _____________________________
On appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings. James H. Peterson, III, Administrative Law Judge.
January 29, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Pretzer v. Swearingen, 394 So. 3d 175, 192 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024) (“Because the relief authorized by section 790.33(3)(f)1. is the remedy in this case, Pretzer could bring an action under section 790.33(3)(f) in circuit court without exhausting any administrative remedies.” (Emphasis in original)).
LEWIS, ROBERTS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Eric J. Friday of Kingry & Friday, PLLC, Jacksonville, for Appellants.
Daniel E. Nordby and Denise M. Harle of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
R.E.P. and D.M.S. v. Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and Wilton Simpson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rep-and-dms-v-department-of-agriculture-and-consumer-services-and-fladistctapp-2025.