Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.

20 A.3d 1187, 610 Pa. 410, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1176
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 23, 2011
Docket672 WAL 2010, 673 WAL 2010, 674 WAL 2010, 675 WAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A.3d 1187 (Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc., 20 A.3d 1187, 610 Pa. 410, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1176 (Pa. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as phrased by petitioners, are:

*411 1. Did the Superior Court err in its determination that the assertion of highly reckless conduct is an affirmative defense contrary to prior decisions of this Court and of the Superior Court which classify such assertion as a denial of causation?

2. Did the Superior Court err in its determination to expand the requirements for proof of highly reckless conduct in contravention of prior decisions of that same [c]ourt?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.
55 A.3d 1088 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 A.3d 1187, 610 Pa. 410, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reott-v-asia-trend-inc-pa-2011.