Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.

20 A.3d 1187, 610 Pa. 410, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1176

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 23, 2011·No. 672 WAL 2010, 673 WAL 2010, 674 WAL 2010, 675 WAL 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as phrased by petitioners, are:

*411 1. Did the Superior Court err in its determination that the assertion of highly reckless conduct is an affirmative defense contrary to prior decisions of this Court and of the Superior Court which classify such assertion as a denial of causation?

2. Did the Superior Court err in its determination to expand the requirements for proof of highly reckless conduct in contravention of prior decisions of that same [c]ourt?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as phrased by petitioners, are:

*411 1. Did the Superior Court err in its determination that the assertion of highly reckless conduct is an affirmative defense contrary to prior decisions of this Court and of the Superior Court which classify such assertion as a denial of causation?

2. Did the Superior Court err in its determination to expand the requirements for proof of highly reckless conduct in contravention of prior decisions of that same [c]ourt?

Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc., 20 A.3d 1187, 610 Pa. 410, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1176 (Pa. 2011).

Pincite

20 A.3d 1187 (Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related