Reo v. Reynaud

N.D. Ohio

Reo v. Reynaud

DecidedJune 14, 2022

Docket1:22-cv-00510

StatusUnknown

This text of Reo v. Reynaud (Reo v. Reynaud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reo v. Reynaud, (N.D. Ohio 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

: BRYAN ANTHONY REO, : CASE NO. 1:22-cv-00510 : Plaintiff, : OPINION & ORDER : [Resolving Doc. 10] v. : : LUDIVINE JOAN CLAUDIA : REYNAUD, et al., : : Defendants. :

JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE:

Plaintiff Bryan A. Reo sues Defendant Ludivine Joan Claudia Reynaud for defamation, false light, and abuse of process.1 Plaintiff now requests this Court order discovery before the parties’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) scheduling meeting.2 Courts have interpreted the federal rules to allow for early discovery when the moving party shows good cause.3 “Good cause is often found in cases . . . where evidence may be lost or destroyed with time.”4 The scope of the requested discovery, however, is relevant to a good cause determination.5 This Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request for early discovery without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile the motion with more explanation on what discovery Plaintiff seeks. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2022 JAMES S. GWIN

1 Doc. 1. 2 Doc. 10. 3 , No. 2:17-cv-720, 2018 WL 8415412, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2018). 4 , No. 2:08–cv–200, 2009 WL 1687927, at *2 (S.D. Ohio June 12, 2009). UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

: BRYAN ANTHONY REO, : CASE NO. 1:22-cv-00510 : Plaintiff, : OPINION & ORDER : [Resolving Doc. 10] v. : : LUDIVINE JOAN CLAUDIA : REYNAUD, et al., : : Defendants. :

JAMES S. GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE:

Plaintiff Bryan A. Reo sues Defendant Ludivine Joan Claudia Reynaud for defamation, false light, and abuse of process.1 Plaintiff now requests this Court order discovery before the parties’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) scheduling meeting.2 Courts have interpreted the federal rules to allow for early discovery when the moving party shows good cause.3 “Good cause is often found in cases . . . where evidence may be lost or destroyed with time.”4 The scope of the requested discovery, however, is relevant to a good cause determination.5 This Court DENIES Plaintiff’s request for early discovery without prejudice. Plaintiff may refile the motion with more explanation on what discovery Plaintiff seeks. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 14, 2022 JAMES S. GWIN

1 Doc. 1. 2 Doc. 10. 3 , No. 2:17-cv-720, 2018 WL 8415412, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2018). 4 , No. 2:08–cv–200, 2009 WL 1687927, at *2 (S.D. Ohio June 12, 2009). UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Reo v. Reynaud, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reo-v-reynaud-ohnd-2022.