Renzulli v. McElrath

286 A.D.2d 335, 728 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7852
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 6, 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent, Terrence J. McElrath, a Judge of the Family Court, Richmond County, from exercising jurisdiction over a [336]*336child custody proceeding entitled Matter of Renzulli v Renzulli, pending in the Family Court, Richmond County, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Maltese, J.), dated May 31, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant commenced a proceeding in the Supreme Court, Richmond County, pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent from exercising jurisdiction over a proceeding brought by her former husband to obtain custody of their two children. The appellant and her former husband were previously divorced by an amended supplemental judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated June 25, 1997. The Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding, finding that the Family Court had jurisdiction over the custody proceeding. We agree.

While the amended supplemental judgment of divorce addressed issues such as child support and equitable distribution, it did not contain an express provision governing child custody or visitation. Furthermore, it did not contain any language retaining exclusive jurisdiction in the Supreme Court or concerning its future enforcement. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the Family Court had concurrent jurisdiction with the Supreme Court over the issue of child custody (see, Family Ct Act §§ 651, 652; Metzger v Metzger, 133 AD2d 524; Matter of Michener v Metcalf, 99 AD2d 925; Matter of Merrill I.S. v Joel S., 92 Misc 2d 92).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Renzulli v. McElrath, 286 A.D.2d 335, 728 N.Y.S.2d 783, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 335 (Renzulli v. McElrath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seleznov v. Pankratova
57 A.D.3d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
EB v. EFB
7 Misc. 3d 423 (New York Supreme Court, 2005)
Matter of Rodriguez v. Johnson
2004 NY Slip Op 50130(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2004)