Renwick v. State
This text of 778 So. 2d 537 (Renwick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael RENWICK, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Law Offices of Carlo Jean-Joseph, P.A., and Aaron M. Dorfzaun (Lauderhill) North Bay Village, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before JORGENSON, COPE, and GODERICH, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion for postconviction relief as untimely. Pursuant to Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999), the petition was timely filed, and should not have been dismissed. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for consideration on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
778 So. 2d 537, 2001 WL 219096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renwick-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.