Renwick v. Macomb

1 Hopk. Ch. 277
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedNovember 19, 1824
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hopk. Ch. 277 (Renwick v. Macomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Renwick v. Macomb, 1 Hopk. Ch. 277 (N.Y. 1824).

Opinion

The Court.

The regular course is, that all incumbrances should he reported before a decree of sale. It is important to preserve this course for the interest of the defendant, who must know the amount of the incumbrances, before he can redeem. It would also be inconvenient, to divide the cause into separate parts to adjust the rights of each incumbrancer. The delay which this complainant suffers, is common to this and to all other like cases. There may be cases where, on special grounds, such a petition as this would be granted; but the present case does not furnish sufficient reasons for departing from the general rule ; and still less, as it is not alleged in this case, that the mortgaged premises are insufficient to secure the debt due to the complainant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hopk. Ch. 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renwick-v-macomb-nychanct-1824.