Renwick v. Mack
4 Edw. Ch. 380, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 423, 1844 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 5
Opinion
The Vice-Chancellor stated that here were three exceptions for impertinence in matter which ought to have been embraced in one exception only; and that, on the question of costs, it would have to be so considered.
Mr. Eddy, for the defendant.
Mr. Dana, for the complainant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Renwick v. Mack, 4 Edw. Ch. 380, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 423, 1844 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 5 (N.Y. 1844).
4 Edw. Ch. 380 (Renwick v. Mack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.