Renwick v. Mack

4 Edw. Ch. 380, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 423, 1844 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 5
New York Court of Chancery·Decided April 2, 1844·Published

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor stated that here were three exceptions for impertinence in matter which ought to have been embraced in one exception only; and that, on the question of costs, it would have to be so considered.

Mr. Eddy, for the defendant.

Mr. Dana, for the complainant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Renwick v. Mack, 4 Edw. Ch. 380, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 423, 1844 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 5 (N.Y. 1844).

4 Edw. Ch. 380 (Renwick v. Mack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.