Renty v. State

358 S.W.2d 390, 172 Tex. Crim. 446, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1035
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 13, 1962
DocketNo. 34,684
StatusPublished

This text of 358 S.W.2d 390 (Renty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Renty v. State, 358 S.W.2d 390, 172 Tex. Crim. 446, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1035 (Tex. 1962).

Opinion

BELCHER, Judge.

Upon waiver of a jury, the appellant was convicted for the offense of giving a check in the sum of $35 without sufficient funds and with the intent to defraud; the punishment, sixty days in jail.

Mrs. Rae Mooney testified that on December 31, 1959, she [447]*447was employed as a cashier for J. Weingarten Incorporated. On that date the $35 check, which is the basis of this case, was presented to her. As agent of her employer she cashed the check after placing her mark of identification on the check and making a photograph of both the check and of the person presenting it.

The photograph showing both the check and the person presenting it, and the $35 check itself were introduced in evidence. These exhibits and the appellant were before the trial judge.

Mrs. Mooney, while testifying, expressed the opinion that the accused was the same person who presented the check and for whom she cashed it. She also identified the check by her mark of identification.

The proof shows that said check was presented in the due course of business to the named bank and was returned unpaid because the account was closed at all times here in question.

The appellant did not testify or offer any evidence, and no brief has been filed on her behalf.

There are no formal bills of exception, and an examination of the informal bills shows no error.

The evidence is sufficient to support the conviction, and therefore the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 S.W.2d 390, 172 Tex. Crim. 446, 1962 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renty-v-state-texcrimapp-1962.