Rentschler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rentschler v. State

838 So. 2d 1212, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2564, 2003 WL 728541

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 5, 2003

DocketNo. 2D02-4325

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 838 So. 2d 1212 (Rentschler v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rentschler v. State, 838 So. 2d 1212, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2564, 2003 WL 728541 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

COVINGTON, Judge.

Charles Rentschler appeals the summary denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse on one claim that the trial court failed to address. On all other claims we affirm the trial court’s denial of the postconviction motion.

A jury found Rentschler guilty of DUI manslaughter. He received a prison sentence of fourteen years. Rentschler alleges that he rejected a plea offer of three to five years because trial counsel failed to inform him of the possible sentences he could receive if he lost at trial. Rentschler says that he would not have rejected the plea offer if he had known that he could be sentenced to fourteen years in prison. Rentschler has made a facially sufficient claim. See Aebi v. State, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D412,-So.2d-, 2003 WL 255550 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb.7, 2003). The trial court’s order did not address this claim, and nothing in the limited record before this court refutes the claim. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

FULMER and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COVINGTON, Judge.

Charles Rentschler appeals the summary denial of his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse on one claim that the trial court failed to address. On all other claims we affirm the trial court’s denial of the postconviction motion.

A jury found Rentschler guilty of DUI manslaughter. He received a prison sentence of fourteen years. Rentschler alleges that he rejected a plea offer of three to five years because trial counsel failed to inform him of the possible sentences he could receive if he lost at trial. Rentschler says that he would not have rejected the plea offer if he had known that he could be sentenced to fourteen years in prison. Rentschler has made a facially sufficient claim. See Aebi v. State, 28 Fla. L. Weekly D412,-So.2d-, 2003 WL 255550 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb.7, 2003). The trial court’s order did not address this claim, and nothing in the limited record before this court refutes the claim. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

FULMER and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

838 So. 2d 1212, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2564, 2003 WL 728541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rentschler-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack