Rentsch Vs. Cavanaugh (Child Custody)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ALVIN RUSSEL RENTSCH, No. 81646 Appellant,
vs.
AMY MARIE CAVANAUGH, FILED Respondent.
MAR 1 9 2021 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY
DEPtJTY CLE
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from a district court order deferring ruling on appellant's motion to modify child support, finding appellant in contempt, and concluding that respondent is entitled to attorney's fees in an amount to be determined. Second Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Washoe County; Sandra A. Unsworth, Judge.
This court ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it appeared that the challenged order may not be substantively appealable. Appellant has now filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. Cause appearing, the motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed.
It is so ORDERED.
, C.J.
cc: Hon. Sandra A. Unsworth, District Judge, Family Court Division Shawn B. Meador, Settlement Judge Bittner Legal LLC Viloria, Oliphant, Oster & Aman L.L.P. Washoe District Court Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
481 P.3d 1260 (Rentsch Vs. Cavanaugh (Child Custody)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.