Rentner v. Rubin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rentner v. Rubin

246 A.D. 694

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate judgment in favor of the plaintiff and to open defendant’s default in answering unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to defendant’s right to make proper application at Special Term to correct the error as to the amount of the judgment. Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate judgment in favor of the plaintiff and to open defendant’s default in answering unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to defendant’s right to make proper application at Special Term to correct the error as to the amount of the judgment. Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Rentner v. Rubin, 246 A.D. 694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 694 (Rentner v. Rubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.