Rentner v. Rubin

246 A.D. 694

This text of 246 A.D. 694 (Rentner v. Rubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rentner v. Rubin, 246 A.D. 694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion to vacate judgment in favor of the plaintiff and to open defendant’s default in answering unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to defendant’s right to make proper application at Special Term to correct the error as to the amount of the judgment. Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rentner-v-rubin-nyappdiv-1935.