Renteria v. City of Canyonville

26 P.3d 162, 174 Or. App. 562, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 809
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 6, 2001
Docket96CV-3903CC; A105257
StatusPublished

This text of 26 P.3d 162 (Renteria v. City of Canyonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Renteria v. City of Canyonville, 26 P.3d 162, 174 Or. App. 562, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 809 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiffs on claims for negligence and inverse condemnation. It challenges only the judgment on the claim for inverse condemnation, asserting that, although its actions were negligent, they did not constitute a taking of plaintiffs’ property. We agree. Vokoun v. City of Lake Oswego, 169 Or App 31, 36-40, 7 P3d 608 (2000). Because the jury’s verdict on the negligence claim supports the full amount of damages in the judgment, the effect of our conclusion is to reverse the award of attorney fees, which was based solely on the inverse condemnation claim.

Award of attorney fees reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vokoun v. City of Lake Oswego
7 P.3d 608 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 P.3d 162, 174 Or. App. 562, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renteria-v-city-of-canyonville-orctapp-2001.