Renteria-Piedrahita v. Thompson

Fourth Circuit

Renteria-Piedrahita v. Thompson

73 F.3d 358, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4175, 1996 WL 4315

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 5, 1996

Docket95-7456

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 358 (Renteria-Piedrahita v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Renteria-Piedrahita v. Thompson, 73 F.3d 358, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4175, 1996 WL 4315 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ricardo A. RENTERIA-PIEDRAHITA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.J. THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown, WV; FEDEARL BUREAU
OF PRISONS; JANET RENO, Attorney General of the
United States; U.S. IMMIGRATION &
NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7456.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 12, 1995.
Decided Jan. 5, 1996.

Ricardo A. Renteria-Piedrathita, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ricardo A. Renteria-Piedrahita appeals from a district court order denying his petition for mandamus relief. We affirm.

Renteria-Piedrahita petitioned the district court to grant him mandamus relief in the form of an order to the Attorney General to begin deportation proceedings as directed by 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1252(i) (1988). The district court found no private right of action and no standing to seek mandamus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1361 (1988). The district court was correct. Amendment to immigration laws in 1994 forbids a construction of Sec. 1252(i) that allows any private individual to force action to begin deportation proceedings. Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994, Pub.L. No. 103-416, Sec. 225, 108 Stat. 4305; see also Campos v. INS, 62 F.3d 311, 314 (9th Cir.1995) (overruling prior Ninth Circuit cases); Hernandez-Avalos, 50 F.3d 842, 844 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 64 U.S.L.W. 3241 (U.S.1995).

Therefore, we affirm the district court order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ricardo A. RENTERIA-PIEDRAHITA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.J. THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown, WV; FEDEARL BUREAU
OF PRISONS; JANET RENO, Attorney General of the
United States; U.S. IMMIGRATION &
NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7456.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 12, 1995.
Decided Jan. 5, 1996.

Ricardo A. Renteria-Piedrathita, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Ricardo A. Renteria-Piedrahita appeals from a district court order denying his petition for mandamus relief. We affirm.

Renteria-Piedrahita petitioned the district court to grant him mandamus relief in the form of an order to the Attorney General to begin deportation proceedings as directed by 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1252(i) (1988). The district court found no private right of action and no standing to seek mandamus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1361 (1988). The district court was correct. Amendment to immigration laws in 1994 forbids a construction of Sec. 1252(i) that allows any private individual to force action to begin deportation proceedings. Immigration and Nationality Technical Corrections Act of 1994, Pub.L. No. 103-416, Sec. 225, 108 Stat. 4305; see also Campos v. INS, 62 F.3d 311, 314 (9th Cir.1995) (overruling prior Ninth Circuit cases); Hernandez-Avalos, 50 F.3d 842, 844 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 64 U.S.L.W. 3241 (U.S.1995).

Therefore, we affirm the district court order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 358, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4175, 1996 WL 4315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renteria-piedrahita-v-thompson-ca4-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack