Rental of School from Authority

81 Pa. D. & C. 223
CourtPennsylvania Department of Justice
DecidedMay 7, 1952
StatusPublished

This text of 81 Pa. D. & C. 223 (Rental of School from Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Department of Justice primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rental of School from Authority, 81 Pa. D. & C. 223 (Pa. 1952).

Opinion

Bolla, Deputy Attorney General,

We are in receipt of your letter of February 5, 1952, requesting to be advised, in construing the provisions of clause (6) of section 2511.1 of the Public School Code of March 10, 1949, P. L. 30, as amended by the Act of January 21,1952, P. L. 2195, 24 PS §25-2511.1, as to whether or not rentals used for the purpose of State reimbursement under this act may, in addition to amortizing the actual cost of the building structure and equipment, amortize the cost of such items as:

(a) Cost of the site;

(b) Cost of excavating, grading and landscaping the site;

[224]*224(c) Cost of building roadways, walks, etc.;

(d) Cost of architects;

(e) Expenses incurred in connection with the forming of the municipality authority such as attorneys’ fees, advertising, printing, etc.

The pertinent part of section 2511.1, supra, is as follows:

“(b) The Commonwealth shall also pay, commencing with the school year one thousand nine hundred fifty-one-one thousand nine hundred fifty two (1951-1952) and annually in each school year thereafter, to each school district which shall have entered into an approved lease with a municipality authority or with a non-profit corporation for the rental of a school building or buildings or providing education equipment, an amount to be determined (1) by multiplying the school district’s standard reimbursement fraction by fifty one-hundredths (50-100) and by the rental or share thereof paid by the school district during the prior school year under its leave with such municipality authority or non-profit corporation, or (2) if the district’s standard reimbursement fraction is greater than five thousand nine hundred ninety-nine ten thousandths (.5999), by muliplying the standard reimbursement fraction by itself and by the annual rental or share thereof paid by the school district during the prior school year under its lease with such municipality authority or non-profit corporation. . . .”

Safeguards on the expenditure of the State funds are provided for in the Public School Code, supra, in section 790, by providing that the school district shall have power to act only upon the written approval of the Department of Public Instruction; and in section 2511.1, supra, by providing that no payment shall be made to any school district unless the lease with the municipality authority is approved by the Department of Public Instruction. In the exercise of that safeguard [225]*225the Department of Public Instruction will only give approval after 'satisfactory proof has been made to it that the expenses incurred are reasonable and not extravagant, and that the project is within the building program as set forth by the department.

Referring to the preceding subsection of section 2511.1, supra, such rentals are to reimburse the school districts for costs on account of “erecting or sharing in the erection of a building or buildings.”

The purpose and intendment of the Act of January 21, 1952, supra, is to provide State reimbursement to those school districts that enter into a contract with an “authority” wherein the school district “rents” from the authority a school building which the school district itself could not build because of the lack of funds or having reached its maximum indebtedness of legal debt limit.

In 9 Am. Jur. 198-99, Buildings, §2, in the definition of a building we have:

“. . . As used in statutes, the meaning of the word generally depends on the particular subject and its connection with other words and varies in practically every case. In construing such statutes, the intention and purpose of the legislature as manifested in the enactment must control. . . .”

It is necessary to consider each item separately to determine whether or not that item comes within the meaning of building and the cost of the building.

(a) Cost of the Site — In 12 C. J. S. 379, Building, we have:

“Inasmuch as a structure must of necessity consist of certain integral parts, the term ‘building’ must, of itself, be broad enough to comprehend any or all of such integral parts. . . .”

In State ex rel. Post v. Board of Education of Clarksburg School Dist. et al., 71 W. Va. 52, 76 S. E. 127, the court said:

[226]*226. . Act of 1911, ch. 70, allows the board to ‘borrow money and issue bonds for the purpose of building, completing, enlarging, repairing or furnishing schoolhouses.’ (b) Does the word ‘schoolhouse,’ used in the statute, mean land, include necessary land? ... When the statute says that the money may be used to build houses, it méans that it may be used to acquire land for schoolhouses. Necessarily so. It is a necessary implication, if the words do not per se mean land, as here used. Commanded to build schoolhouses, it is an incidental power because indispensable to attain the end. You cannot build a schoolhouse without land on which to build it.

“In view of the law above stated, and in view of the purpose which must have been in the minds of the legislators who enacted the bond section, we hold that the words ‘schoolhouses’ include land, for schoolhouses.

In 9 C. J. 684, under the definition of “Building” in footnote (g), we have:

“As including the land on which it stands.— (1) The term ‘building’ includes the real estate on which it is situated, unless the general meaning of the terms is modified by the language of the context. Gidley v. Lovenberg, 35 Tex. Civ. A. 203, 209, 79 SW 831_”

Section 790 of the Public School Code of March 10, 1949, P. L. 30, as added by the Act of January 21, 1952, P. L. 2195, 24 PS §7-790, provides:

“(1) To sell, lease, lend, grant or convey to such municipality authority, individually or jointly, with or without consideration, any lands, easements or rights in lands which may be deemed necessary for the project, together with any buildings, structures or improvements thereon erected, as well as furnishings and equipment used or useful in connection therewith.”

Where land or land and buildings are transferred to the municipality authority without consideration it [227]*227must be excluded from the determination of the rental.

Accordingly, it is our opinion that the building and the cost of the building includes the site and the cost of the site.

(b) Cost of Excavating, Grading and Landscaping the Site. — In 12 C. J. S. 379, Building, we have:

“Inasmuch as a structure must of necessity consist of certain integral parts, the term ‘building’ must, of itself, be broad enough to comprehend any or all of such integral parts. . . .”

In 9 C. J. 684, under the definition of “Building” in footnote (/), we have:

“As including foundations and cellar.— (1) ‘The word “building” necessarily embraces the foundation on which it rests; and the cellar, if there be one under the edifice, ... If there be a cellar, the word building includes it unaffected by the idea of its height above the foundation’:Benedict v. Ocean Ins. Co., 31 N. Y. 389, 394. . . .”

In 18 Words and Phrases, pages 604-05, it is stated:.

“ ‘Grading’ includes filling as well as cutting, and technically means the reducing the earth’s surface to a given line fixed as the grade and may include filling or excavating, or both: Louisville & N. R. Co. v. State, 193 S. W. 113, 137 Tenn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benedict v. . Ocean Insurance Company
31 N.Y. 389 (New York Court of Appeals, 1865)
Gidley v. Lovenberg, Administrator
79 S.W. 831 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1904)
Ryan v. City of Dubuque
83 N.W. 1073 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1900)
State ex rel. Post v. Board of Education
76 S.E. 127 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1912)
Louisville & N. R. Co. v. State
137 Tenn. 341 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 Pa. D. & C. 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rental-of-school-from-authority-padeptjust-1952.