Renswick v. Providence Hosp. & Med. Centers, Inc.
This text of 690 N.W.2d 93 (Renswick v. Providence Hosp. & Med. Centers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John D. RENSWICK, personal representative of the estate of Marion Renswick, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTERS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:
I would reverse in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and would reinstate the plaintiff's claim of malpractice to the extent that it alleges that the second surgery was a result of the nurse's failure to accurately account for the sponge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
690 N.W.2d 93, 471 Mich. 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/renswick-v-providence-hosp-med-centers-inc-mich-2004.